As we have written about before, DBE fraud involving a pass-through scheme, whereby a certified DBE performs no commercially useful function but receives a a commission for allowing their status to be used by a prime contractor, is by far the most common form of DBE fraud.
While less common, but no less illegal, is a the form of DBE fraud known as a front scheme. There a DBE is certified and performs a commercially useful function but the DBE is not actually owned and operated by a socially and economically disadvantaged individual.
A recent case from Idaho shows that federal prosecutors are just as willing to prosecute DBE front schemes as they are DBE pass-through schemes and the consequences of engaging in this type of scheme are just as severe. Elaine Martin, former president of Marcon, Inc. a certified DBE, was sentenced to 7 years in jail, ordered to forfeit over $3 million, pay over $120,000 in fines, and pay prosecution costs of $32,575, for her role in a DBE front scheme. Martin submitted false documents in order to become a certified DBE. The documents submitted made it appear that Marcon was owned and controlled by Elaine Martin. In reality, other persons and shareholders had a role in the firm that raised questions about Marcon’s independence. Martin was also guilty of concealing her net worth for DBE and SBA purposes and tax evasion – among other transgressions.